SEDGEFORD HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH PROJECT
WEST HALL HOUSE
|
As part of larger
research into the West Hall area, work was done in 2000 on West Hall House. A standing building survey was
undertaken of the interior and exterior of the building.
An investigation into the gardens of West Hall was also
done, to look for interesting features, such as the
structure of the gardens in the past. A small-scale
investigation into the documentary evidence concerning
West Hall was also carried out, allowing us to learn much
about the manor in the past. |
|
|
The present West
Hall house is believed to stand on the site of a medieval
manor, of which there are no structural remains, but many
documentary references to an estate of Norwich Cathedral
Priory. Therefore, the standing-building survey had a
number of important purposes: |
|
The manor of Sedgeford had a higher value
than any of the other manors owned by Norwich Cathedral
Priory. It is thought that the West Hall Manor was
divided into two courts, with a separate moat around
each, but the precise location of these is unknown today.
On the present site a stream runs parallel with the north
and west walls of the house and there is also evidence of
where this stream continued to the south of the West Hall
grounds, although it is at present overgrown and dry.
This stream may follow the path of a medieval moat, but
would have been unlikely for defence purposes, instead
representing the status of the manor. |
|
|
|
|
West Hall House may
not have any visible structural remains dating back to
the manor in the medieval period, but at least six phases
of rebuilding can be seen in the fabric of the house
itself. The eastern end is the earliest remaining part of
the structure, where there is an original chimney
appearing to date from circa 1600. Very little of the walls of this eastern
section can be seen as they are concealed by extensions
to the north and south, and an extension to the west. The
eastern wall that remains unfortunately does not contain
many original features, such as windows, but has been
subject to many periods of rebuilding. The middle section
of the house is of a later date than the eastern end. The
western end of the house is an 18th century
extension; as it can be seen in the 1797 inclosure map. It is probable
however that the western end has been replaced or rebuilt since 1797. The south wall is the
front wall of the house and shows the scars of rebuilding phases. It is probable that at the time of
this western rebuild there were also alterations to the
southern front of the house. |
|
|
These alterations
would have been made as it was important for the front of
the house to look symmetrical for aesthetic reasons. The
front of the house contains at least one set of blocked
windows in the middle section. These windows were
probably blocked and replaced when the western end was rebuilt, in order for the front facade to remain
symmetrical. |
|
|
There are two additions on the
north side. The eastern one may be of two builds,
containing a single storey and the later addition of
another storey. There are possible marks on the walls on
the west, north and east sides that indicate this. The
idea that this has been extended from a single storey
outshut to a two-storey outshut is made probable due to
alterations to the heights of windows in the lower level.
There were three windows at a lower point, of which one
was filled in and replaced by two windows that were
slightly higher up. It is likely that
this would have been the result of a heightening of the
wall that allowed the builders more space in which to
place the window. |
|
|
The northwest
outshut is the most modern part of the construction and
contains some renovations where doorways were converted
into windows. There is also an outshut at the front of
the house, at the eastern end. This outshut is later in
date than the eastern section, but is probably only a
little later than the middle extension. The outshut is
interesting as it has undergone many renovations. This is
typical of any structure that is on the facade of the
building. The outshut bears the scar of an old
conservatory and the effects of internal reorganisation.
In this outshut a staircase has been moved from the
eastern to the western end. Where the staircase was added
is evident as a doorway has been blocked in and a new
door inserted at the foot of the stairs. |
|
|
A brief
history of West Hall Manor |
|
|
The Rolfes held the leases of
East Hall and West Hall farm between 1767 and 1889, at
which time the lease was refused extension by the
ecclesiastical commissioners (Berry 1979). The Rolfes,
like the Le Stranges, were also given much freedom
concerning the property. This is seen when William Utten
told Edmund Rolfe, they leave the management of
that building to your care and judgement in 1775 (NRO,
DCN 118/5). The property transferred into the hands of
the Ecclesiastical Commissioners (as did most of the Dean
and Chapter property) in 1869. |
|
|
References Berry, 1979, The Rolfe Papers; The Chronicle of a Norfolk Family 1559-1908 Norwich: Mrs. Veronica Berry. Dodwell, 1975, The Charters of Norwich Cathedral Priory. Pipe Roll Society. (NRO, DCN 118/5) Quoted in Atherton and Holderness, 1996. |
|